The LIRR Loses Out to Metro-North

The LIRR takes a few blows from Metro North as it loses ridership, and why it should get more support from local residents.

I am an enthusiastic rider of the LIRR whenever it serves my transportation needs. Riding oftentimes with my bicycle on board I take it to see my Aunt in Lindenhurst, my grandmother in East Meadow or into the city to spend an evening with my girlfriend(who rides NJ Transit in from NJ.)

I see the LIRR as an institution to be proud of on Long Island, especially when you consider how a vibrant commuter railroad with as much off peak and weekend service as it has, is foreign to much of our country. It might seem odd that I speak of a transportation resource which is not in Hauppauge, yet it is at most 3 miles or 10 minutes to a nearby station by car, which practically makes us a railroad suburb.

A sequence of news items within the past few weeks have painted the role of the railroad in the daily lives of Long Islanders as increasingly tragic. These items were Metro-North surpassing the LIRR in the number of riders over the past year (82 million to our 81 million), the potential plan to bring Metro-North into Penn Station and the continued outcry against the metropolitan commuter mobility tax (payroll tax/MCMT).

Respecting our loss of ridership and the plans for Metro-North, I think even given the tough economic times that are beset upon the island, there are limited excuses why Metro-North - whose service population and quality of service is less than our own - should be outstripping the LIRR. As tragic as it is, if we fail to utilize the LIRR for the tremendous transportation resource that it is, we deserve to potentially lose service at Penn Station to Metro-North. Ideally, we should be seeking projects like the present Ronkonkoma Hub project at all LIRR stations throughout the island to build our own ridership base and justify increased future service levels.

Additionally, the presence or absence of the MCMT should have little to do with waste or inefficiency in the MTA, but the consistency of its revenue and the quality of service throughout the region. All of the MTA's funding sources prior to the MCMT were intensely variable based upon the economic climate, and stood to harm the system to the point where it would not provide a cost effective travel alternative to hard pressed Long Islanders during tough times, something called the vicious spiral of transit that typically in hard economic times when ridership increases, transit funding decreases. I say this as a Long Islander who supports comprehensive reform, increased public accountability and the enhanced provision of service in Suffolk County.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

WheelsNeedDeals.com February 19, 2012 at 07:56 PM
I've lived in Westchester county and LI. I have to say the LIRR is much more convenient than the Metro North. Trains are more frequent and your schedule can be more flexible. That goes double for younger people who stay out late in the city. Metro North stops running at 1:50am and starts again after 5:30m. LIRR runs all night.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »